In its most basic form, Bin processing segments the
warehouse facility into discrete named locations. There are different types of bins, some of the
most common are bulk storage and picking.
Bulk stocking locations are designed for large pallet type ordering and
will often contain overstock and is located further away from picking, staging
or shipping areas. Picking areas are
situated for the majority of picking operations. One example may be, 80% of your orders are by
the case and these items are stored in the picking areas of the warehouse. 10% of your orders are by pallet and the
remaining 10% are bulk storage for replenishment of the standard picking
units.
This sounds more complicated than it actually is. The point is that inventory should be stored
where it can be replenished and picked with the greatest efficiency. The actual names and percentages are not as
important as understanding how your organization stores and picks inventory to
fulfill order processing.
The question to consider is whether or not you want to
trust the computer system to manage that inventory storage. If you cannot trust your system, then you are
either using the wrong system, or do not have a system.
Trust is the key.
I was asked recently if I thought Bin processing
worked. The organization had limited
space, a lot of inventory, and a lot of movement. They were physically moving the inventory and
redrawing maps by hand to accommodate the changes.
Contrast this with
a system that manages where to place and where to find inventory
(automatically).
There is a lot of overhead in the manual processing this
company performs. Regardless, they are
doing well. They order, receive, move
inventory, pick and ship inventory. They
have adapted over time to a system that is an efficient method of inventory handling,
for them. Their system would not likely
work well with another company’s warehouse.
They have adapted. They use the resources they have to operate
and fulfill their customer’s needs.
When asked if I thought bin processing would work, two
thoughts went through my mind.
One, they would not be asking if they were running as
well as they thought they could. People
do not generally look for answers to unasked questions. They are working, operating as well as they
could, but obviously they are hitting a performance wall. Not enough space, not enough people, not
enough sales, not enough something.
Two, the answer is “Yes”, but… yes, if they let (trust)
the system do what it is designed to do.
Most modern inventory systems work, if you let them do the work. Automated systems look at inventory
transactions and movements and will let you know where to store received items
and when and where to replenish picked items.
They system “knows” where the inventory is. The system “checks” and verifies the
locations as inventory is processed (handled).
The system “knows” where the inventory is and what to list for picking
or put-away operations.
The problem
usually comes in several forms.
One, people try to out think the system. A lot of time and energy goes into a modern
inventory (IM) and warehouse management system (WMS). A lot of smart people and a lot of trial and
error went into these systems. The systems
work. They work if you let them do what
they are designed to do and you learn to trust them.
Two, some people as well intentioned or negligently move
inventory and do not inform the system.
People are smart too. People
invented computerized systems and recognize their limitations. This is a good thing. This knowledge can be used to further tweak
the systems. Good systems learn from
their users. The problem comes from
people acting independently. If you touch
and move inventory, then you need to let the system know about any and ALL
changes. The sooner, the better.
A nice feature in newer systems is what is called Count-back
systems and they are another asset to modern systems that are used to verify
and an increase the accuracy of inventory.
Count-backs from an overview seem to add extra time to inventory
picking, however, in the long run inventory accuracy is enforced and confidence
builds. Workers begin to trust the
system.
For example, if you send someone to a location that should
contain 100 cases of inventory and they are supposed to pick 20. This means when they count the remaining
there should be 80 left. If there is
not, then the system halts until the problem is resolved (bypassed in an
emergency). This practice holds the people
accountable. They learn quickly that
they need to get the inventory processing correct. They have responsibility.
Inaccuracy is not acceptable.
So yes, inventory bin processing works, if you let the
system manage the inventory. Do not get
creative, let the system work for you and not the other way around. It is like cutting wood with a saw. You can force the saw into the wood and get
an inaccurate sloppy cut or you can let the saw process the wood at the pace it
is designed and get a clean accurate cut that does not need to be repeated,
reduces waste and ends-up increasing efficiency (savings).
Hopefully this overview makes you stop and wonder if you
are taking full advantage of your inventory system and the efficiencies and
savings it can bring to your operations.
There are many aspects to these systems, the above is just one
example.
Contact
us today at Dolvin Consulting to learn
more about what a modern inventory control and warehouse management system can
do for your company. We are here and
love to help.
The information on this blog is very useful and very interesting. If someone needs to know about the IT detail please click
ReplyDeleteChicago ambient warehouse